Carbon Guide




SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard v2.0 – A Carbon Credit Strategy


The SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 2.0, expected in Q4 2026, represents the most significant shift in the Voluntary Carbon Market since the original standard was introduced. While carbon credits still cannot replace direct emissions reductions, SBTi now formally recognises the use of high-integrity carbon credits as a supplementary form of climate action, through its new Ongoing Emissions Responsibility (OER) framework. Set to launch in 2027, the framework provides an important demand signal for the market, while maintaining the core principle that companies must first decarbonise their own operations.

Under the programme, “high-integrity emission reduction projects, avoidance projects, carbon removal projects and other eligible climate contributions” remain eligible until 2035. After that point, companies will be required to address a growing share of their ongoing emissions through carbon removals rather than reduction or avoidance credits. The proportion of long-lived to short-lived removals starts at 10% and increases gradually, reaching 100% by the company’s net-zero year.

PeriodEligible under OERPurpose
2027โ€“2035 (voluntary)Reduction credits, avoidance credits, nature-based removals, engineered removals, and other eligible climate contributionsRecognition for companies delivering climate contributions
2035โ€“2050, or sooner net-zero year (mandatory for Category A companies)Carbon removals only. At least 10% must be long-lived removals in 2035, increasing gradually to 100% by the net-zero yearAddress a growing share of ongoing emissions

As set out in the updated standard, companies must select a recognition level and, over the near-term target timeframe, deliver climate contributions at a scale determined by the required coverage of their ongoing Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions under that level.

Carbon Guide Image

The revised standard also changes how organisations should communicate about carbon credits. Companies should continue to present emissions reductions within their own operations and value chains as the primary route to achieving their science-based targets. Carbon credits should be communicated separately, as supplementary climate action or beyond-value-chain mitigation, rather than as instruments used to achieve SBTi compliance. Claims suggesting that carbon credits have enabled a company to meet its science-based target, or to offset its Scope 1, 2 or 3 emissions, are no longer consistent with the architecture of the new standard. Instead, organisations should explain that carbon credits represent additional investment in global climate mitigation, alongside continued emissions reductions in line with science-based pathways.

The publication of Version 2.0 has been widely welcomed across the Voluntary Carbon Market, as it provides greater certainty around the role of carbon credits within credible corporate climate strategies. The revised standard therefore offers both a near-term demand signal for existing high-integrity projects and a long-term investment signal for emerging carbon removal technologies.


How Can Anthesis Support You?


  • Monitor forthcoming SBTi guidance on integrity criteria, so your strategy stays ahead of the curve.
  • Review and refine your SBTi roadmap in light of the updated standard.
  • Separate emissions reductions from supplementary climate action, ensuring your strategy and communications reflect this distinction.
  • Develop a carbon credit procurement strategy, including a clear internal definition of “high integrity.”
  • Define an internal claims policy that aligns with the new standard’s communication requirements.
  • Evaluate a long-term removals strategy, and hedge your position through our portfolio of projects.

Webinars On Demand

Did you miss our recent webinars?

a business man using a laptop at a desk